Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, April 14th, 2025 at 1:52 PM, otto.cooper <otto.coo...@proton.me>
wrote:
> On Monday, April 14th, 2025 at 1:16 PM, Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:14:23PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >
> > > Just a thought:
> > >
> > > if the reason you are setting up two network interfaces on a system to
> > > connect to the same
> > > subnet is to use as much as possible of the bandwidth offered by the
> > > interfaces, would
> > > it not make more sense to configure them as parts of a trunk(4)?
> >
> > No, I believe it is still the "firewall in the middle of a subnet"
> > footgun design, from the "group egress" thread sometime ago.
>
>
> Yes, it is "still" the "footgun" design, where the gun was removed by simply
> ignoring "egress":
>
> > grep group /etc/hostname.*
>
> /etc/hostname.ix0:group wan
> /etc/hostname.ix1:group wan
> /etc/hostname.ix2:group lan
> /etc/hostname.ix3:group lan
Wrong machine...
> grep group /etc/hostname.*
/etc/hostname.em0:group wan
/etc/hostname.em1:group wan
/etc/hostname.ix0:group lan
/etc/hostname.ix1:group lan
