We have taken a wrong path by trying to synchronize our releases with OpenBSD.
This is why you guys are confused now, OpenBSD 5.4 was tagged a while ago and OpenSMTPD was tagged at the same time and so it ships with a version that is very close to 5.3.3 but which isn't really 5.3.3 nor what we want to release for our "next" major. Long story short: You should always run our "stable" version which is advertised on our website since that's always going to be the last stable one. We have decided to rework how we do our releases so that it removes all the confusion from the last few months. Very soon, we will release 5.4.1, which will be our first stable release for 5.4. When OpenBSD will tag 5.5, we will not rush to tag OpenSMTPD 5.5 but simply ship our latest known stable 5.4.x, this way no more bastard versions. Gilles 2013/11/8 Joel Carnat <[email protected]> > Le 8 nov. 2013 à 19:21, Bryan Vyhmeister <[email protected]> a écrit : > <snip> > > > >> So since OpenBSD X.X is released, the only way to get new featured or > >> bug corrected OpenSMTPD is either use OpenBSD "HEAD" or OpenSMTPD > >> snapshots, right? > > > > That's correct. I ran into an obscure bug only triggered by spam-sending > > mail hosts with super long commands but it was a bug and, when I > > reported it, it was fixed in a couple of hours and in a snapshot right > > away and so I have been running OpenSMTPD snapshots with success ever > > since. I can't ask for better than that from the developers. > > OK, let's go for it this way :) > Thanks! > -- > You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] > >
