On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 06:12:13PM +0200, Norman Golisz wrote: > Hi, > > [...] > > > And about ancient mua, I will follow the rule "if this does't work with > > opensmtpd I will not use it :)" > > At least when it comes to security-related stuff. Otherwise, if you > think there's a useful feature OpenSMTPD doesn't yet support, you're > always free to bring it into discussion (I'm not entitled to speak in > the name of this project and its developers, but I think the community > is generally open to this kind of discussions). >
yup, that's why I didn't comment, your answer was 100% accurate ;-) We're open to this kind of discussions, however one thing that you can hold true and that discussions will not change: We're not downgrading security. We want to push for more encryption and make it so easy to setup that there's no excuse not to have it enabled. We won't accomodate legacy software if it means downgrading security. > > Sorry for bothering, all questions solved > > You're welcome. > Yup, discussions and questions are welcome on this list :p -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
