On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 07:17:12PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > > Well, you asked what distributions packagers thought, and I presented it > from point of the specific distribution. There are always some issues, not > only pure technical ones. >
I know and the reason I'm stating clearly my thoughts on this is so that you and others understand our position. I get it that you don't have all solutions at hands and that it might take time to solve them. We're not killing OpenSSL support tomorrow, just preparing for this, and trying to assess what technical issues will fall on us while maintainers can assess what technical & non-technical issues will fall on them. > > There's no straight way, so how do we plan for a curvy way ? :-) > > Well, if you feel that way that openssl slows the development progress > down, but we have no idea when libressl will be available there, what can I > say? I would just propose to keep openssl support as long as possible. > Yes, however OpenSSL won't provide a libtls API, and this means that the current situation will go on forever which we don't want. We will keep openssl support for a while still, we're not killing it the day after tomorrow. > I'll re-open libressl packaging discussion in Fedora right after Christmas, > and in case of positive decision me or anybody else would support libressl > pro bono. There is no schedule here. > Understood but that would already be a great step for us, Thanks -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
