> --On 09 May 2005 23:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> So maybe the Dev-team would be so friendly to write (for 3.8. e.g.?) >> the archs behind the drivers. > > The list of drivers supported on each arch, are on the webpage about > that arch.
Why? http://www.openbsd.org/37.html Lets read it together: "Improved hardware support, including:" - a lot of drivers It's not like: "Many enhancements in the OpenBSD/mac68k port." So it's generell and that made me thought the drivers would run on at least every arch the CD-Set supports too. I mean: hey it's no problem: Yes you're right.. Take a view at the arch-specific Website and you get the answers.... ok. But is it realy so hard to write: "Improved hardwaresupport for i386".... I mean... the responseable "Webdesigner" or "Contentmanager" (or however) does it also for the GCC. "OpenBSD/i386 and OpenBSD/macppc now use gcc 3.3.5." and not "We now use gcc 3.3.5." It's like LINUX: "We support"... And at the end just half of the things work on half of the archs wich are supported by the OS. I don't dislike OpenBSD, I don't have any problem with the ATH-Driver or the developer of the driver. But I've a huge problem with the fact how some things are announced. The informations for GCC are precise and clear. The informations for the WLAN-Drivers are not. They're general Linux-like "We support".... That's what I dislike... it's not efficent. And I think some ppl. dislike it maybe too. Kind regards, Sebastian
