On Thursday 16 June 2005 20:31, Niall O'Higgins wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:11:46PM -0400, Nick Bender wrote: > > Why wouldn't a two drive ATA/SATA system which was raidframe mirrored > > stay up if one of the drives went belly up? I've been spending some > > cycles automating the kernel build/raidframe configure process > > assuming it was worth the extra effort.... > > Controllers don't tend to like it. Sometimes with disk failure, the > controller will fail too!
On the sort of hardware I'd consider running SATA RAID on, you've got at least two controllers, driving four or more ports. Blow a controller and a drive, and you're just waiting till you can afford a replacement drive and controller/motherboard. -- Simon Farnsworth [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]