On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, poncenby wrote: > > Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a > > further cut-down libc, you could trim it more. > > Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the time or > experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with anything but dietlibc. > any chance of pointing me in the right direction?
you don't have the ability to fix fnord, but you're going to port dietlibc to a new OS? if fnord will only work with dietlibc, seems like that's the problem and you should tell the author to fix it. -- And that's why Abbie Hoffman was such a boon for them.
