Unsupported hardware - see attached
-- 
=======================================================================
"He is an emissary of pity and science and progress, and devil knows
what else."- Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad
=======================================================================
                              David J. Schuller
                              modern man in a post-modern world
                              MacCHESS, Cornell University
                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu ([unix socket])
        by postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu (Cyrus v2.1.11) with LMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 
2005 18:58:39 -0400
Received: from hermes31.mail.cornell.edu (hermes31.mail.cornell.edu 
[132.236.56.56])
        by postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id 
j65MwaVd001222
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:58:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from filter02.mail.cornell.edu (filter02.mail.cornell.edu 
[132.236.56.28])
        by hermes31.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id 
j65MwYrJ024966
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:58:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by filter02.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.10/8.12.6) id j65MwXr8016396
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp109.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp109.mail.sc5.yahoo.com 
[66.163.170.7])
        by filter02.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id 
j65MwUip016358
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 25427 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2005 22:58:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pinky.westerback.to) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@24.42.21.250 with login)
        by smtp109.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2005 22:58:30 -0000
Received: by pinky.westerback.to (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A932A2; Tue,  
5 Jul 2005 18:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:58:29 -0400
X-PH: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Kenneth R Westerback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David J. Schuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OpenBSD3.7 i386 unsupported hardware
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-PMX-Version: 4.6.1.107272, Antispam-Core: 4.6.1.106808, Antispam-Data: 
2005.7.5.30
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.0, Antispam-Data: 
2005.7.5.29
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:46:08PM -0400, David J. Schuller wrote:
> I installed OpenBSD 3.7 from the CD. I used the i386 port. Neither the
> installation process nor the resulting OS installation recognized my
> ethernet ports, leaving that machine incommunicado.
> 
> The motherboard is a Commell LV-673 with a Pentium M processor and two
> Marvell Yukon 8053 PCI-express gigabit ports.
> 
> dmesg says:
> skc0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Marvell Yukon 8053" rev 0x15: irq 12
> skc0: bad VPD resource id: expected 82 got 0
> skc0: Marvell Yukon (Unknown) Gigabit Ethernet (0x1)
> sk0 at skc0 port A: address 00:03:1d:02:20:fc
> skc0: unknown deevice type 182ppbl at pci0 dev 28 function 1: Intel
> 82801FB ? rev 0x04
> skc1: ... (similar lines)
> 
> 
> No "available interfaces" showed up during installation.
> 
> ifconfig -a reports only lo0, pflog0, pfsync0 and enc0.
> 
> I would like to know if support for this hardware has been added since
> the 3.7 initial release, or if it is likely to be added soon.
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> =======================================================================
> "He is an emissary of pity and science and progress, and devil knows
> what else."- Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad
> =======================================================================
>                               David J. Schuller
>                               modern man in a post-modern world
>                               MacCHESS, Cornell University
>                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
You're far more likely to get a reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED] This
list is for send-bug bookkeeping.

.... Ken

Reply via email to