On 7/18/05, James Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, my objective is to have fail-over on the outbound connections, > primarily. The load-balancing comes about because of that. > Load-balancing is definitely not a requirement for this site and I > probably should have worded my email a bit differently. One > connection is a cable modem and the other ADSL. > > I really want the connections to fail-over when the other isn't > available. I achieved this through the current configuration but, > maybe not in an optimal fashion. I don't need to balance the incoming > connections (and don't want to) but, I'm having issues getting the > gateway to reply w/o balancing issues. > > I've attached my newest pf.conf in the hopes that you might be able to > see my error. This is (obviously) the first time I've worked with > this type of setup so, I'm uncertain where the issue lies. It seems > like I need to get rdr and reply-to to work together but, maybe there > is a different method. > > Thanks, > > James > > <snip>
You'll probably save alot of lines in your pf.conf if you just do this: pass in on $ext_if1 reply-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from any to \ $ext_if1 keep state pass in on $ext_if2 reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from any to \ $ext_if2 keep state
