badmagic wrote:

No, that's not it. I just clipped the wrong part of my dmesg.
It's running under GENERIC kernel.


Bryan Irvine wrote:

Maybe because you are using the RAMDISK kernel?  Try switching to
GENERIC, and see if that works better.

--Bryan

On 9/15/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,

I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for the screen to scroll through the list and try it via ssh! Slow. I'm using it as a Web server and it's noticably slower at serving pages than the old x86 I had doing the job before was.

Anyone know something about this?

Regards,
sl

Here's it's dmesg (This took forEVER):
/*--------------------8<---------------------

console is keyboard/display
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1995-2005 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 3.7 (RAMDISK) #344: Sun Mar 20 14:38:37 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/RAMDISK
total memory = 134217728
avail memory = 112893952
using 819 buffers containing 6709248 bytes of memory
bootpath: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0:f
mainbus0 (root): Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 270MHz)
cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi @ 270 MHz, version 0 FPU
cpu0: physical 32K instruction (32 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 256K external (64 b/l)
psycho0 at mainbus0 addr 0xfffc4000
SUNW,sabre: impl 0, version 0: ign 7c0 bus range 0 to 2; PCI bus 0
DVMA map: c0000000 to e0000000
IOTDB: 10bb4000 to 10c34000
pci0 at psycho0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 vendor 0x108e product 0x5000 rev 0x11
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ebus0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 vendor 0x108e product 0x1000 rev 0x01
auxio0 at ebus0 addr 726000-726003, 728000-728003, 72a000-72a003, 72c000-72c003, 72f000-72f003
power at ebus0 addr 724000-724003 ipl 37 not configured
SUNW,pll at ebus0 addr 504000-504002 not configured
sab0 at ebus0 addr 400000-40007f ipl 43: rev 3.2
sabtty0 at sab0 port 0
sabtty1 at sab0 port 1
comkbd0 at ebus0 addr 3083f8-3083ff ipl 41: layout 34
wskbd0 at comkbd0: console keyboard
com0 at ebus0 addr 3062f8-3062ff ipl 42, mouse: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
ecpp at ebus0 addr 3043bc-3043cb, 30015c-30015d, 700000-70000f ipl 34 not configured fdthree at ebus0 addr 3023f0-3023f7, 706000-70600f, 720000-720003 ipl 39 not configured
clock1 at ebus0 addr 0-1fff: mk48t59: hostid 809f8b30
flashprom at ebus0 addr 0-fffff not configured
SUNW,CS4231 at ebus0 addr 200000-2000ff, 702000-70200f, 704000-70400f, 722000-722003 ipl 35 ipl 36 not configured hme0 at pci1 dev 1 function 1 vendor 0x108e product 0x1001 rev 0x01: address 08:00:20:9f:8b:30
nsphy0 at hme0 phy 1: DP83840 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
hme0: using ivec 3021 for interrupt
vgafb0 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 vendor 0x1002 product 0x4754 rev 0x9a
wsdisplay0 at vgafb0: console (std, sun emulation), using wskbd0
pciide0 at pci1 dev 3 function 0 vendor 0x1095 product 0x0646 rev 0x03: DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide0: using ivec 1820 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: <FUJITSU MPD3043AT>
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 4125MB, 8448300 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <GoldStar, CD-ROM CRD-8240B, 1.24> SCSI0 5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
ppb1 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 vendor 0x108e product 0x5000 rev 0x11
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
pcons at mainbus0 not configured
No counter-timer -- using %tick at 270MHz as system clock.
rd0: fixed, 6144 blocks
root on rd0a
rootdev=0x500 rrootdev=0x3d00 rawdev=0x3d02

--------------------8<----------------------*/




Any chance of getting the complete proper dmesg.

I have 3.7 release running on 6 or so Netra X1s and the performance and stability is perfect. Faster processor on the X1 500mhz but less processor cache, these machines have 1GB ram

What was the speed of the i386 you are comparing to.

Do you have any other error messages

Try disabling pf if not already

Reply via email to