>Thanks for the suggestion.  Unfortunately, bridge(4) doesn't
support  
>pppoe(4) as a possible interface.   I don't know why, but it
just  
>rejects it.  Anyone know of a workaround for this?  I'm on a
100mb/s  
>FTTH line so a userland pppoe is not an option.
>
>Kory T

i don't think you can filter PPPOE packets b/c they're setup
as ethernet frames. see
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=29843&highlight=pppoe+bridge
or search the archives.

AFAIK, the point of a pppoe tunnel is to put the packets into
and out the frames needed to use PPPOE. so until the packets
pop out of the ethernet frames, pf can't grok them. i'm pretty
sure i'm not talking garbage, but someone can feel free to
correct me if i'm wrong.

cheers,
jake

>
>On Oct 10, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
>
>> While I have never done it myself, I THINK that you might
be able  
>> to do it with bridging the pppoe interface with an ethernet  
>> interface.  Play around a little bit.
>>
>> --
>> Chris
>>
>> On 10-Oct-05, at 8:44 AM, Talmage wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I've been reading through manpages and tutorials but have
not been  
>>> able to get an answer to a question I have.
>>>
>>> I am wondering if it's possible to use OpenBSD as an
unnumbered  
>>> PPPoE client bridge.  Basically a transparent bridge that  
>>> processes packets for PPPoE so the rest of the network
doesn't  
>>> have to deal with PPPoE.
>>>
>>> [internet]-----[ISP(PPPoE
Server)]====[modem]====[openbsd(PPPoE  
>>> Client)]-----[multiple static IPs]
>>>
>>> Kory T

Reply via email to