Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice. OpenBSD opts for one strategy (bufcache = 10%) and Opensolaris opts for another (bufcache close to 100%).
> * Amit Kulkarni <[email protected]> [2011-03-30 23:19]: >> Might be okay for high physical memory machines but not low. I >> remember Opensolaris also filled out bufcache for ZFS, which was a >> bloated pig. > > and ClaimsToBeOpen-Solaris' bufcache allocation strategies have > exactly what to do with openbsd's?
