On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:10:35PM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:51:34AM +1300, [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > # cvs -d [email protected]:/cvs diff -u bge.4
> > Index: bge.4
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/bge.4,v
> > retrieving revision 1.50
> > diff -u -r1.50 bge.4
> > --- bge.4       9 Jul 2010 07:10:55 -0000       1.50
> > +++ bge.4       22 Mar 2011 18:57:36 -0000
> > @@ -193,10 +193,7 @@
> >  A fatal initialization error has occurred.
> >  .It "bge%d: couldn't map interrupt"
> >  A fatal initialization error has occurred.
> > -.It "bge%d: no memory for jumbo buffer queue!"
> > -The driver failed to allocate memory for jumbo frames during
> > -initialization.
> > -.It "bge%d: watchdog timeout"
> > +.It "bge%d: watchdog timeout -- resetting"
> >  The device has stopped responding to the network, or there is a problem 
> > with
> >  the network connection (cable).
> >  .El
> > 
> 
> stuart has already removed the jumbo buffer diagnostic. that leaves the
> watchdog timeout...
> 
> digging further in src/sys:
> 
> /usr/src/sys/dev/ic/ti.c:       printf("%s: watchdog timeout -- resetting\n", 
> sc ->sc_dv.dv_xname);
> /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ix.c:   printf("%s: Watchdog timeout -- resetting\n", 
> if p->if_xname);
> /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bge.c:  printf("%s: watchdog timeout -- resetting\n", 
> sc ->bge_dev.dv_xname);
> /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c:   printf("%s: watchdog timeout -- resetting\n", 
> sc ->sc_dv.dv_xname);
> /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ixgb.c: printf("%s: watchdog timeout -- resetting\n", 
> sc ->sc_dv.dv_xname);
> 
> of these devices, only ti(4) and bge(4) have DIAGNOSTICS sections. both
> omit "-- resetting".
> 
> so, would any developer like to comment on whether there is a reason for
> it being documented this way, or whether we need to change the docs or
> not?
> 
> jmc

no one commented, so i went ahead and added "-- resetting" to both the ti(4)
and bge(4) manuals.

thanks for your mail,
jmc

Reply via email to