On May 15, 2011, at 15:25, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:24:27PM +0200, Oeschger Patrick wrote: >> i was playing with virtual routing on openbsd4.9 recently >> first results using vlans are impressive >> now i am asking myself if virtual routing is possible >> - without using dedicated physical interfaces for each routing domain >> - without using dedicated vlans for each routing domain >> >> idea behind this: >> i have a network appliance with 3 interface (int/ext/mgmt) >> i want to configure 5 routing domains >> i have limited number of physical interfaces >> i do not want to use vlans >> >> so what i would need in this case is something like a virtual ethernet >> interface >> - which can be bound to a physical ethernet interface (similar to vlans) >> - and the virtual virtual ethernet interface should be assignable to a routing >> domain >> >> any ideas? >> guess aliases of an interface are not assignable to a routing domain...(?) >> maybe something in progress in the dev tree? >> >> many thanx >> /pat >> > > vether(4) ? > > .... Ken >
well... i guess vether(4) cannot be attachted to a physical interface maybe i'm wrong here(?) had a glimplse at vether(4) yesterday /pat
