On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Wolfpaw - Dale Corse wrote: > > > > You may well be right, though I would say that the amount of Code > > > changes users would be required to do, to make it work > > Would end up in > > > my lap, seeing as there are some things OpenBSD's Kernel does not > > > have, or has fairly out of date versions of > > > > > > One example I can think of is libpcap - and it seems to be Lagging > > > behind more because some folks are upset that the devs There won't > > > accept their commits, then actually fixing the software. > > > > Either submit complete bug reports or diffs, but stop whining. > > I wasn't whining - again - how the hell is justifying what I said > whining?
You are saying our libpcap is buggy, but you fail to justify that claim. > > > Perhaps I will port it .. And see how many people yell at > > me for That. > > > :) > > > > We have good reasons not to blindly follow changes in libpcap. > > >From what I understand they are security related reasons.. Would anyone > care to expand a bit on that, so that I may know what to look for > when doing so? This sums it up: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-04/0971.html -Otto
