On 10 June 2011 07:45, Ingo Schwarze <[email protected]> wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote on Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:21:38PM +0000: > >> Seriously, if whoever "maintains" openbsd-wiki.org is reading, >> do us all a favour and take it offline unless you have time to look >> after it... > > Even if you have the time to maintain it, > take it offline all the same. > Your time is better spent helping nick@ to improve the FAQ > and helping jmc@ to improve the manuals, > because there you don't start from scratch > and users actually find your documentation. > And it is checked by developers for relevance and accuracy > and kept up to date. > > To re-iterate what i said here: > > http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan11-mandoc-openbsd.html (page 2) > > "Make documentation easily accessible: > Have it at as few places as possible, > and as much as possible at one single place. > In OpenBSD, almost all documentation is manuals, > and the little that doesn't fit there is all in the FAQ." > > Well, there's a bit more, but not much. > Like /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/. > > We most definitely do *not* want documentation scattered around > half the web, ending up with most of it utterly outdated and > unmaintained.
At least phallus pills are available there.
