I think moving the 1a heading up a bit makes sense. We then
have a paragraph of intro then sysmerge is in 1a and the
patch section in 1b.

ok/comments?

-lum

Index: upgrade49.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/upgrade49.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 upgrade49.html
--- upgrade49.html      3 May 2011 01:44:20 -0000       1.12
+++ upgrade49.html      11 Jun 2011 05:58:00 -0000
@@ -273,13 +273,16 @@ file was copied to /dev by the installat
 Whether you upgrade by using an install kernel and doing a formal  
 "upgrade" process, or do a "in-place" binary upgrade, you need to update
 the system configuration files which are included in the <tt>etc49.tgz</tt>
-which we have not been dealt with so far.
+which have not been dealt with so far.
 There are two processes we provide for you -- manually copying over some
 files and patching others, or using the
 <a 
href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sysmerge&amp;sektion=8";>sysmerge(8)</a>
 process.
 
 <p>
+<a name="sysmerge"></a>
+<h3>1a. Merging locally changed files via sysmerge(8)</h3>
+
 <b>Who should use sysmerge(8):</b><br>
 People running highly modified systems or systems that didn't start out
 at the previous release (for example, a snapshot part way between
@@ -310,9 +313,7 @@ files.
 Rest assured, later runs of sysmerge will be far less painful, and often
 completely effortless.
 
-
-<a name="sysmerge"></a>
-<h3>1a. Merging locally changed files via sysmerge(8)</h3>
+<p>
 The
 <a 
href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sysmerge&amp;sektion=8";>sysmerge(8)</a>
 utility will compare the files that are actually on your system with

Reply via email to