Okay, STeve. Right on. I see no need to discuss this topic here. I am more
interested in the differences in perspective of Theo and Linus. I addressed
Linus' blog out of interest in his concern in the ongoing developments.
Even then, I consider Linux to be a kernel packaged with a bunch of
ancillary programs from GNU.  I am happy to be composing this email on my
primary OpenBSD system.
Daniel


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:57 AM, STeve Andre' <[email protected]> wrote:

> Linux is not OpenBSD, it's Linux.  What happens there does not affect
> OpenBSD.  Likely at some point it will be revealed what happened.  At
> any rate it isn't germane to these lists.
>
> --STeve Andre'
>
>
> On 09/17/11 03:40, Daniel Villarreal wrote:
>
>> I'm still worried, though. There's some mystery involved, how did "they"
>> get
>> root ?
>>
>> http://isc.sans.edu/diary.**html?storyid=11497<http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=11497>
>>
>> kernel.org is indicating "Down for maintenance." Ouch.
>>
>> http://www.linuxfoundation.**org/ <http://www.linuxfoundation.org/> has
>> some information, but they're still
>> "investigating."
>>
>> Looking at Linus' plus.google.com account doesn't give much information,
>> either.
>>
>> Wondering when and if we can expect results on the compromise.
>>
>> Hmm.
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Chadwick<[email protected]**
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:38:27 -0700
>>> lancebaynes87 wrote:
>>>
>>>  I love OBSD, and I don't want it to fail like kernel.org:
>>>>
>>>
>>> What happened, a ssh account password was stolen followed by local
>>> privile;-Dge escalation.
>>>
>>> They have said that as far as code goes, no harm was done. The worrying
>>> part was how the admins handled the server afterwards (just reboot and
>>> see what happens isn't exactly a strategy and could make things
>>> much worse). I guess that's because they don't really care too much
>>> about the server aside from functionality as the code is protected by
>>> the developers many systems and eyes.
>>>
>>> I'm also not sure if the hacked servers were running the website.

Reply via email to