hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek said that > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Johan Ryberg wrote: > > > Why not https://github.com/openbsd? > > > > I think the whole community can benefit a total move to github. > > > > They have it all =) > > > > Regards Johan > > The repository will never be in a place outside direct control of the > developers and especially Theo. A bug database might be different, but > so far there's only been talk and no actions.
time to bring in fossil! :] source control, wiki _and_ ticketing system in one under bsd license! now seriously. i am sure the devs have looked into many bug tracking systems before announcing that all of them are "inadequate". but the previous one sucked more balls than any homemade php/mysql monstrosity, so i guess anything would be an improvement. regarding github (or other sites like that), the main repository needs not change. a cvs post-commit hook might simply commit to that github repo -- a fancy mirror with a built-in issue tracker. another possibility might be asking an open source friendly issue tracker producer if they'd be interested in providing unlimited license to this open source project (atlassian comes to my mind[1]). no harm in asking... [1] http://www.atlassian.com/about/community/free-open-source-licenses.jsp -f -- there is never sunshine without shadow.
