Or use the BIOS to initialize the logical disk.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:32:38AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On 26/10/2005, at 12:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
> 
> >jon and marco,
> >
> >thx for the quick replies. this is more or less what i expected.
> >
> >if you install through the RAID controller, shouldn't it
> >autodetect the number of actually available sectors (i.e. the
> >"full" size modulo that required for the RAID info)? that's
> >the thing that really surprised me.
> 
> If there is already a disklabel on the disk detailing its geometry  
> then it will use that rather than write a new one based on the  
> geometry reported by the driver. To blow away the existing details  
> boot the installer, dd some zeros over the start of the disk (dd if=/ 
> dev/zero of=/dev/rsd0c bs=512 count=1024), and then reboot. When you  
> install onto the disk this time it should have the correct values  
> since there were no previous ones on disk to use.
> 
> If dd seems a bit harsh you could try fdisk -i /dev/rsd0c followed by  
> disklabel -dE sd0.
> 
> Let us know how you go.
> 
> dlg
> 
> >
> >
> >>dlg and I had a look at this and we concur with Jon.  You can
> >>
> >move a single
> >
> >>disk RAID 0 from behind the ami controller and use it as a
> >>
> >single disk.  What
> >
> >>you can't do is going the other way around (from SATA
> >>
> >controller to RAID 0).
> >
> >>After reading your email we gathered it is what you did.
> >>
> >>Can you please confirm that these were your installation steps?
> >>
> >
> >when i did try to install through the controller, as suggested
> >above, the following (from my original post) happened:
> >
> >"i then tried to reinstall onto that disk from the CD drive i
> >have attached to the machine with the RAID controller in it.
> >when it came time to create the partitions with disklabel, i
> >got the same error as before and it occurred when my /home
> >partition was being initialized."
> >
> >or do i have to "manually" calculate the number of sectors i
> >can allocate in disklabel?
> >
> >i will try to reproduce this if you feel it necessary.
> >
> >regards,
> >jake

Reply via email to