On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:17:10PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > thank everyone. > > routing domains seem to be much more powerful than I need. > I just needed outgoing packets through the appropriate interface, it > can be achived by "reply-to" thing in PF. >
You can also use a simple additional routing table. route -T 1 add default X.Y.Z.1 this way the routing table will use routing table 0 to find the gateway (all interfaces are in the default rdomain 0) and pf will just tag the packets to use the other table for route lookups (adding rtable 1 to rules will send all traffic to X.Y.Z.1 for forwarding). For simple things route-to/reply-to is maybe easier to setup. -- :wq Claudio
