On Fri, Mar 9, 2012, at 08:47 PM, Lars Hansson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <czark...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > So you state that the fact that "if one chooses to use the whole disk, > > the whole disk is used" needs further documentation? > > Well, since this is the one of the few (only?) destructive actions the > installer takes > I can certainly see why being really clear could be considered an > improvement. > That said, I have never had this problem myself but maybe that's because > I > only very rarely install on multi-boot systems. I don't need this > particular feature > but it won't bother me if it is implemented either. > > > Hell no! There is no improvement in making 100% clear statement twice as > > long just because of one user who failed to read that statement. More > > precisely, it is clear direct damage, as it makes the "text/information" > > ratio twice as high with no increase in the "information" part. > > I can remember when people said similar things about the installer in the > early 2000's. > Funny how it has been improved since then with all kinds of stuff, like > not > having to manually calculate the slice sizes and deal with LBA/CHS etc. > > Cheers, > Lars > >
Please remove all references to multibooting from the FAQ. Thank you.
