On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 17:23, ropers wrote: >>> http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan11-mandoc-openbsd.html >> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks >> with browsers configured to default to utf8 in the absence of encoding >> qualifiers.
I think that complaint, as pointed out, is bogus. Only broken browsers are broken. > +<p>Csikó - Foal. - Photo: Adam Tomkó @flickr (CC)</p> gods, no. html entities are the last thing I want to see. > So again, the complaint was that there was mojibake gibberish in > Ingo's presentation, because the character encoding isn't specified > but defaults to UTF-8 in modern browsers, while the page is actually > iso-8859-1 encoded. Again, only broken browsers are broken. I think things (encoding wise) are fine as they are.
