On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:24:38PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:00:07PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > > On 12/15/12 11:45, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote: > > > Do you think an AMD Elan 133 Mhz is "modern" enough for at 54/mbit > > > wireless WPA2 throughput? > > > > Are you kidding me? > > That's about as non-modern as OpenBSD/i386 supports. Seriously. > > That's a 4x clock multiplied 486. > > The only things less modern and supported are 3x, 2x, and 1x 486 chips. > > > > The machines I have seen those chips in have difficulty pumping that > > much data, ignoring encryption (though in large part, I suspect, due to > > the crappy NIC chips). > > > > Nick. > > Not to mention that OpenBSD-based access points rarely sustain 54Mbit/s > throughput in general. Rate adaptation in the net80211 stack is rather basic. > Most of the time slower speeds are selected even if in close range to the AP. > There's a high amount of interference where I live and wireless speed > usually settles at 1 or 2Mbit/s even right next to the AP. > > sephe at Dragonfly has made some interesting changes to rate adaptation > in his patches to their version of ral(4) and the Dragonfly network stack. > I took a look at them once but they're mostly over my head so I gave up on > porting them. But such improvements are unlikely to help a 133Mhz PC anyway :) >
Sounds like OpenBSD is not quite ready for being a production Access Point.
