Moritz Grimm wrote:
Using the parameter ``-q "(q_med, q_pri)"'' does not result in any error
message, however, I have no proof whether this works or not. Actually,
[...]
Hm, and while I'm at it ... how can things like these be properly tested
and debugged in the first place? Other than making educated guesses with
[...]
Replying to myself here ... I found out that I can get the rules
inserted by ftp-proxy with
pfctl -a ftp-proxy/xxxxx.y -vvsr
and it looks like the queue statements were accepted. However, the ACKs
definitely don't end up in q_pri but my default queue (q_def). I
compared that to what happens when i use "-q q_low", and indeed,
everything ends up there with only one queue name as the argument.
Now I'm just a bit confused, but at least I know that maybe, in theory,
it could work the way I want. :-)
Moritz
