On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:45, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> --- edit.c.orig 2012-10-31 19:21:31.742319303 +0100
> +++ edit.c 2012-10-31 19:21:44.031181937 +0100
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@
> int rval = 0;
>
> for (add = 0, wlen = len; wlen - add > 0; add++) {
> - if (strchr("\"#$&'()*;<=>?[\\]`{|}", s[add]) ||
> + if (strchr("\"#$&'()*:;<=>?[\\]`{|}", s[add]) ||
> strchr(ifs, s[add])) {
> if (putbuf_func(s, add) != 0) {
> rval = -1;
I think so too.
>
> Didn't send the diff; I think because of the general lack of interest in
> ksh patches in the past.
I don't think that's always true, sometimes the interested people
aren't interested that day, or in that patch. But as a project, we
strongly encourage people to continue using ksh instead of resorting
to bash, so keeping ksh working and usable is important.
In general, I think no feedback is closer to good feedback than bad
feedback.
