On 07/06/13 21:39 -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote: >On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Anybody manage to install Ruby 1.9.3 or 2.0.0 with rvm? It worked just >> fine on 5.1. Have I missed anything in the changelog? >> > >rvm is an external tool that builds ruby from source. In my experience, it >doesn't work well on OpenBSD, as it mostly targets Mac OS X and Linux >users. In any case, the OpenBSD developers do not support it. > >We encourage people to use precompiled packages built specifically for >OpenBSD. There is a ruby 1.9.3 package for OpenBSD 5.3, and packages for >both ruby 1.9.3 and 2.0.0 in -current. `sudo pkg_add -i ruby` > >Thanks, >Jeremy > We've been working hard on compat recently, although we're currently blocked on an upstream bug in ruby 2.0: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7959
The best approach is to file issues on the RVM repo with the output of rvm intall [ruby <flags>] --trace if there are issues, and someone (likely myself, mpapis or envygeeks) will have a chance to chase it up. People are right in saying that it's unlikely to be an issue in OpenBSD that's broken. richo -- richo || Today's excuse: Satan did it http://blog.psych0tik.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
