Hate to burst your bubble here but 64bit x86 is also known as AMD64
since AMD was the first to bring x86-64 to market since Intel at the
time had the attitude of "why would any one want 64bit" </history>
On 2013-06-30 21:06, Jash Sefferson wrote:
Hi guys.
I’m a civil engineer by day and use OpenBSD at night, but I’m trying
to do
high-end CAD on my home PC and OpenBSD doesn’t support 64-bit Intel
chips.
Don't believe me? It says very clearly at the OpenBSD/amd64 page: “All
versions of the AMD Athlon 64 processors and their clones are
supported.”
But does not mention or list any Intel chips. Not one.
Wtf? I can do CAD on my i7-980X under Windows 7 SP 1, but I’d rather
use something secure and responsibly coded like OpenBSD. Except that I
can't.
Why for the life of this platform are we not on the only future
direction
for the platform? And I mean that literally. Neither AMD nor Intel
sells
32-bit chips anymore. If OpenBSD remains stuck at 32 bits, people will
stop
using and developing for it.
Who makes the decision to keep OpenBSD off of 64-bit Intel? And why
the
hell are they doing so?
-jash
--
Jason Barbier
C:(206)650-6542|E:[email protected]
