jash as u have seen i have really being kicked even theo kick my ass so i was
totally wrong im the guy who needs to read i was totally confused since im a
dummy i tought that amd64 mean all 64 bits arch either by AMD or INTEL but NO
it seems that i was the guy who need to read and dig on it sorry dude i sure
not and never answer nothing until i really REALLY know all of it! have a nice
day.



> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD Doesn't Support 64-Bit Intel
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:48:10 +0000
>
> IA64 its the name of the arch for the processor created originali by AMD
and
> INTEL copied so support for AMD64 mean INTEL64 too! dont complain if u
really
> dont read all of the info (i understand now why my questions are not
answered
> LOL)
>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:06:05 -0400
> > Subject: OpenBSD Doesn't Support 64-Bit Intel
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I’m a civil engineer by day and use OpenBSD at night, but I’m trying to
do
> > high-end CAD on my home PC and OpenBSD doesn’t support 64-bit Intel
chips.
> >
> > Don't believe me? It says very clearly at the OpenBSD/amd64 page: “All
> > versions of the AMD Athlon 64 processors and their clones are supported.”
> > But does not mention or list any Intel chips. Not one.
> >
> > Wtf? I can do CAD on my i7-980X under Windows 7 SP 1, but I’d rather
> > use something secure and responsibly coded like OpenBSD. Except that I
> > can't.
> >
> > Why for the life of this platform are we not on the only future direction
> > for the platform? And I mean that literally. Neither AMD nor Intel sells
> > 32-bit chips anymore. If OpenBSD remains stuck at 32 bits, people will
stop
> > using and developing for it.
> >
> > Who makes the decision to keep OpenBSD off of 64-bit Intel? And why the
> > hell are they doing so?
> >
> > -jash

Reply via email to