On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:10:34PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2013-09-23 12:54, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:25:57AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
> > > * Marc Espie <[email protected]> [2013-09-23 12:22:47 +0200]:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:32:20AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
> > > > > To update packages: pkg_add -iu (-i is for interaction to selection
> flavors of pkg's and -u is for update). Must be run with privileges, i.e. sudo
> or root user.
> > > >
> > > > You don't need -i in most cases these days, pkg_tools default to
> interactive
> > > > if run on a terminal now.
> > > >
> > > > (-I can be used to revert to non-interactive mode)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cheers Marc, I wasn't aware of that. Just a habit I got into ages ago.
> >
> > Yeah, it's something I look at in usage patterns.
> >
> > Lots of people don't follow the tools development too closely,
> > and so they keep using options which are no longer needed.
> >
> > Then they teach those to other people, thus ensuring that
> > people keep thinking things are more complicated than
> > they are...
> >
> > I'd really like a solution that didn't involve me having
> > to rectify things again and again, but it's better than nothing :)
> >
> 
> How about a warning or notice when the user explicitly states "-i" saying
> "this is already the default and deprecated" if it's run from a tty?

No, that's clearly overkill... tools are supposed to get out of the way,
not chant in your face "hey, look at my huge penis".

Reply via email to