Ok, Ok, fair enough. Go for it. With a managed switch though you could do all of that with one phy and vlans.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:14 PM, emigrant <[email protected]> wrote: > min. 3xNICs: wan, lan, pfsync. Hmm 6xNIC == WAN 2x aggregation > ports+failover+lacp, LAN 2x aggregation ports+failover+lacp and pfsync > 1port = 5port use. You know, everything 4fun, btw i have 24G managed switch. > > Supermicro? no way! :), ugly, audio, video,vga,hdmi, dp. No, no, no ;) > > On 22 paź 2013, at 01:44, noah pugsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:06 PM, emigrant <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I need to replace my crappy, old machine(Master) Futro S400( >> http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/thincli ents/futrosxx/futros400.htm >> http://cl.ly/image/3C0Z363q0M1O http://cl.ly/image/311f3U260R37 ) for >> something new. My Backup machine is Alix 2D3( >> http://cl.ly/image/2M2x1l1V0k1r ), is perfect for that(carp+pfsync, only >> pf and small things) :) >> >> Hmm, Soekris net6501-70( http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html ) or >> Lanner FW-7541( >> http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/desktop/fw-7541). OK, simple question, what's better?:) Price is almost the same. In my >> opinion Soekris is a little bit obsolete. >> My requirements: small, home router/server, fanless: pf(altq+hfsc) for >> ~15 hosts, carp+pfsync, nat, named, www, samba, ftp, UniFi >> Controller(jre+mongod), pfstat, ipfm, pf logs, SSD(CF is too slow). >> Hmm, Lanner looks better, 6xNIC, 1xrj45 console port, newer hardware, >> memory(ddr3) upgradable(i think so?), dual core Atom 64bit, all ports on >> front. >> Soekris, maybe more professional product? >> Any suggestions? >> >> > For not too much more $$ it looks like the Lanner is the better option. Do > you really need that many nic's? You might do just as well with a cheaper > supermicro box. Just a thought. > > http://www.superbiiz.com/detail.php?p=SY-117AMP > > -noah
