Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote: >> frantisek holop <min...@obiit.org> wrote: >> >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for >> >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing >> >this simple nitpicking patch: >> > >> >- Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. >> >baseXXX.tgz, >> >- compXXX.tgz, ...) are not binary packages fit for pkg_add(1). >> >+ Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. >> >baseXY.tgz, >> >+ compXY.tgz, ...) are not binary packages fit for pkg_add(1). >> > >> >-f >> >> Yes, but I think we use baseXX.tgz notation. >> >> Now, if this had only been a proper diff, we'd know what file you're >referring to... :-/ > >Clue: it's all in the subject line.
Ah, indeed. Still, a proper diff is preferred.
