On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:10:05PM +0100, Sia Lang wrote: > Virtual machines/emus and canadian cross builds should be able to reduce > the amount of iron, no?
Just a side note to the people talking about emulators. Obviously, you're not tried to install OpenBSD on emulators. Basically, everything is broken except amd64 and i386. Feel free to create guides to teaching us how to install each platform supported on some emulator. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Theo de Raadt > <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org>wrote: > > > >Through the history of openbsd there have been architectures in which > > more bugs have been found and some in which fewer bugs have appeared. > > > > That is not true. > > > > >Then maybe the number of bugs for an architecture can be matched to the > > power-on-time for the machines for that architecture. > > > > Maybe. Probably need them on to prove or disprove the point. > > > > >For example, if 1% of the total number of bugs in the history of openbsd > > have appeared on architecture x, then it's likely that it will continue to > > be so, then all the machines for that architecture should be powered on > > just 1% of the time. > > > > Another great advantage here is that all the pesky developers who love > > those machines will go away, and we'll only need to run on the best > > architectures (which of course, are big endian). > > > > >Then perform that analysis on all architectures to make a more better use > > of energy. And that's it. > > > > It's so simple. Why didn't I think of it. > -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
