Nick Holland wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* "design".
The current openbsd.org doesn't "work" at 640x480... Does that make it a
bad design? And hence should be considered a bug to be fixed by a new
design?
So, where do you see a practical problem?
I don't see a problem at all...
I would like to see a list of
what pages you saw an unreasonable problem at 640x480 (or my more
stringent test). Or are you just making noise?
I was pointing out the flawed argument by Hannah through the use of an
example. That having a design that is tailored, or ideal, for some
specific sizes or range of sizes, makes it a '*bad* "design"' (Hannah's
words).
--
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
