On Nov 28, 2005, at 9:37 AM, J Moore wrote:

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:24:03AM -0500, the unit calling itself Kenneth R Westerback wrote:

And if it's the one-man show you claim, why don't you let "the man"
speak for himself? Or if you've been hired as the "official OpenBSD
bitch", please - let us know.

As far as I can recall Theo has already commented once that the
website is not going to be redesigned in the forseeable future since
it is accomplishing its purposes as laid out by Nick. I doubt that
this topic is of sufficient interest to generate multiple comments.

Well that's fine - and I assume Nick knows this? So why do you suppose
he felt it necessary to jump down the guy's throat? Why not just let it
go? That way, Nick could spend his time brushing up on web design
instead of wasting it in this fashion?

I assume it's because Nick is a VOLUNTEER that spends an unlimited amount of time keeping the site updated with CONTENT. He knows that no matter what design changes he wishes to make will undoubtedly be shot down by Theo since the site is already FUNCTIONAL and meets the goals of the project.

I don't speak for Nick, but I imagine he probably feels a bit unappreciated when folks feel like nitpicking his "design", when that is probably not his job (certainly not his focus) in the first place. If you want to bitch about the design, take it to the ultimate arbitrator-- Theo, preferably OFFLIST.

--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net

Reply via email to