> I agree. This falls under the philosophy the more secure the machines > out there in the wild (even if it is a ghastly thing known as > Windows), the better off I we are. If they use OpenBSD based > technologies to help with security more power to them. > > _Raju > > On 12/1/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:18:41PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > --On 01 December 2005 05:02 -0800, Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno wrote: > > > > > > >http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&; > > > >ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16 > > > > > > "The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet Filter (PF)" > > > that's just sick..! > > > > sick, perhaps, but that is the purpose of the BSD license. > > Would you rather they reinvent the wheel badly, or base it on something > > well written? Hopefully, the more platforms PF gets "ported" to > > (somehow, I think in the case of Windows, "ported" should go in quotes), > > probably the better off the world is...
Furthermore, since I know these people who wrote this software, and have even stayed at their homes for days at a time while visiting Argentina, I fully support them :)
