Am 06.06.2014 14:15, schrieb Kapetanakis Giannis:
On 06/06/14 14:49, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Eric Furman said:
Given the current circumstances Libre.SSL WILL prevail.
I hope you are right, but I actually believe that the circumstances of
this thread may work against LibreSSL - most likely the time difference
between vulnerability disclosure and patches for LibreSSL would be
percieved as security risk.
Let's hope then that when LibreSSL is in production it will not share
the same vulnerabilities with OpenSSL. Otherwise, what's the point?
G
well I don't know much but the point in removing 90k of c code lines
from something that is messed up means to make it more solid but that's
just my point of view and I'm just a dummy
--
Markus Rosjat fon: +49 351 8107223 mail: ros...@ghweb.de
G+H Webservice GbR Gorzolla, Herrmann
Königsbrücker Str. 70, 01099 Dresden
http://www.ghweb.de
fon: +49 351 8107220 fax: +49 351 8107227
Bitte prüfen Sie, ob diese Mail wirklich ausgedruckt werden muss! Before you
print it, think about your responsibility and commitment to the ENVIRONMENT
