On 3 Dec 2014 at 18:36, dev wrote:

> > > > You are speaking out of turn, basically insulting people who
> want
> > > > to make sure that older architectures do work.  The Sun Fire
> V890
> > > > and Niagara machines are not sparc architecture.  They are
> > > > sparc64.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Not sure where the anger is coming from. Regardless, there may
> be
> > > people
> > > that are interested in running OpenBSD on a DEC alphaserver or
> even
> > > a
> > > Sun SparcStation 20 from 1996 and that may just be entertainment. 
> I
> > > would hope that there was an interest in more modern
> architectures
> > > where
> > > OpenBSD may run very very well.
> > 
> > Oh just shut up.
> > 
> > I would hope you can keep your mouth shut when people talk about
> the
> > things they love to hack on.
> > 
> > Because otherwise, you know, you might come off looking like you
> are
> > a self-entitled prick who only wants them to work on things you
> want,
> > you know?
> 
> 
> Actually I was closely following the discussion on utf8 issues and
> found
> it interesting. OpenBSD is generally looked at as a serious and
> secure
> UNIX implementation and I was giving consideration to getting GCC
> 4.9.2
> built ansd tested on it.  I don't see results[1] in the GCC project
> for
> recent GCC and felt it would be of value to try.  With a recent GCC
> it
> may have been possible to then build Apache 2.4.x and some other
> things
> that would allow an up to date set of tools to exist.  These would
> allow
> a web site to run with great security and stability. Really that was
> my
> entire interest in OpenBSD.  Oh, that and the LibreSSL work and
> OpenSSH
> of course.
> 
> You, however, seem to feel a need to crash into a room like a mad
> man
> off his meds.
> 
> Not sure what your intent is.  What is it?  Really?

Pot meet kettle. Of course the big difference is that kettle has been 
running the show (and very successully too) for the past two decades.

Now, let this thread die! All entertainment value has long evaporated.

> Dennis
> 
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/buildstat.html

Reply via email to