On 2015-01-19, Remco <[email protected]> wrote: >> OpenBSD >> # shutdown -ph 1501161730 >> >> other BSDs >> # shutdown -p 1501161730 > > It makes sense to me to imply -h when specifying -p.
I'd love it, but for all I know somebody may have a strong opinion against it. On the one hand, "shutdown -hp" is inconsistent because we don't have "shutdown -hr" either. On the other hand, "-hp" mirrors "halt -p". > --- shutdown.c 16 Jan 2015 06:40:01 -0000 1.38 > +++ shutdown.c 19 Jan 2015 12:03:03 -0000 > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > nosync = 1; > break; > case 'p': > + dohalt = 1; > dopower = 1; > break; > case 'r': I don't like this. Instead, all the places that handle dohalt and doreboot should be extended with dopower; see the FreeBSD code. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [email protected]
