On 2015-02-16 14:43, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Not this particular switch, but there isn't much that can go wrong with > statically configured link aggregation like this.
On 2015-02-17 16:49, Adam Thompson wrote: > >DGS-1100 definitely does not support active LACP negotiation. The >"static trunk aggregation" it talks about is, basically, static >bonding, or what was once called EtherChannel. Which is exactly what >the trunk(4) manpage refers to as "IEEE 802.3ad static link >aggregation". You're good to go. I can confirm, now that I have the switch, that loadbalance doesn't work with my implementation, and I'll have to do more testing to determine why. I have roundrobin under test now, and it is working well so far.
