Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > On 3/19/2015 9:36 AM, Bryan Steele wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > >> Given that the patches in tedu's announcement to the tech@ list are all > >> time-stamped circa 18 Mar 2015 06:01:34 -0000, may I safely assume they are > >> included in the amd64 snapshot dated 18-Mar-2015, the earliest file of > >> which > >> has a timestamp of 18:55? > >> > >> I need to bring my snapshots up-to-date anyway, and upgrading will probably > >> be as fast or faster than re-building the libraries. > >> > >> Thanks. > > > > No, assuming the contents of a snapshot seems like a particularly unsafe > > thing to do. > > Agreed. Assuming is a bad idea. My question was inartfully posed. Let me > try again. > > A quick perusal of the patches gives no evidence of a bump in version > number. How is it possible to know whether these patches are included in > a given snapshot or not?
It's not. The 18th snapshot definitely doesn't have them though.
