On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:11:21 +0900
Joel Rees <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Kevin Chadwick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
> > Joel Rees wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with
> >> patience.
> >>
> >> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
> >>
> >> But fvwm, the "default" window manager, is no lighter than XFCE4.
> >
> >
> > Do you mean xfwm which is based on fvwm, if so the lightness is
> > likely similar but full XFCE is obviously heavier as it takes
> > longer to load up, but ofc ourse it does a lot more.
> 
> On my twelve or thirteen year old single-processor 32-bit box running
> a Japanese IME and stuff that works with Japanese, fvwm doesn't really
> feel any lighter. Typing really lags sometimes when the processor gets
> busy.
> 
> Which is what I should have said and didn't. Sorry.
> 
> > I've also had instances where the
> > whole of XFCE locks up, which doesn't happen with fvwm.
> 
> I've locked up fvwm twice today, but I'm sure it's because I don't
> know what I'm doing yet.
> 
> > Also one
> > xfce-terminal seems to be able to take out all the others which
> > doesn't happen with xterm and you hit process limits.
> >
> > I still use fvwm1 rather than fvwm2 but that is mainly because I see
> > little need. Pcmanfm has a terminal here and find built in by
> > default that Thunar doesn't have  but whilst pcmanfm is still
> > usable it does core dump sometimes with fvwm1 whilst it doesn't
> > seem to with fvwm2, perhaps that is because I only enable some dbus
> > services. Whatever the reason that has to be primarily a bug in
> > pcmanfm and not the fault of fvwm. I still haven't worked out if
> > fvwm2 is as easy to lock down as fvwm1 either and the config
> > migration seems to have dropped fvwm1 support now too.
> >
> > https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/spectrwm
> >
> > Is a tiling wm and hacked up by OpenBSD devs. I'd be using that but
> > I'm not sure I could make it easy for my users to use it (not it's
> > aim) and until I have time to find out then I like to use whatever
> > I give my users. Of course that's chicken and egg so it's probably
> > time I switched and found out. However simply getting a consistent
> > dark theme across apps with differences between current and release
> > is challenge enough.
> 
> Yeah, I need to make time to experiment and learn better ways to do
> things, too.
> 

I'm *extremely* pleased with Openbox with customized hotkeys, including
a hotkey for dmenu. Please note that Openbox is not the slightest bit
useful unless and until you make customized keystrokes and make a 6
pixel margin on the left so you can always click the desktop.

SteveT

Steve Litt 
Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting
http://www.troubleshooters.com/28

Reply via email to