> > Should mk.conf(5) be present in /etc/examples, or is it not there on > > purpose? > > After hier(7): > > /etc/ System configuration files and scripts. > ... > examples/ Example configuration files for base system daemons. > > So I don't think so :^)
While this may not be the case for mk.conf(5) there are other cases this question may concern. Better escalate this instead of decisively ruling out reconsideration. Is examples a good candidate for samples of everything etc that the user may be wondering about compared to only contain examples for base system daemons? Would the user benefit from a sane starting point for other configs, optionally when none are already in etc?
