Cheers man. All the best to you too -- and to everybody else around.
On 1 January 2016 at 01:18, Erling Westenvik <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0100, ropers wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote:
>> >> It says here <http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SendDmesg> that one
>> >> should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I
>> >> AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably).
>> >>
>> >> If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between gmail-dmesgs or no
>> >> dmesgs, would gmail dmesgs be preferable to none (however unloved
>> >> their text-flow shenanigans may be)?
>>
>> On 31 December 2015 at 12:55, Erling Westenvik wrote:
>> > Wouldn't a simple one-liner like this do the trick?
>> >
>> > $ dmesg | mail -s "some subject" [email protected]
>>
>> Q: If all I have is a green herring, would eating that be better than
nothing?
>> A: You should eat a red herring.
>>
>> (SCNR. ;-)
>
> Guess I deserved that one. To my defence: I was simply incapable of
> imagine a scenario where Gmail would be the only option for sending a
> dmesg somewhere.
>
> But – A Happy New Year to you and everyone on the list!
>
> Regards
>
> Erling
