On 2016/01/28 08:50, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > On 27.01.2016, at 23:31, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > > > This does the trick. It probably doesn't make sense to run multiple > > copies of all of the privsep daemons though I see definite use cases > > for httpd, snmpd [v4 and v6 need separate daemons], and possibly some > > others, but it would be better to keep them all in-sync.. > > > > Fine, this is what I suggested as the first option. > > But let's do it everywhere and not just for httpd - > don't use setproctitle in the parent process. > > It does make sense for many more privsep daemons, especially in combination > with rdomains (ntpd, iked, …). bgpd would probably not need it, but it does not harm > and I'd prefer to change it for consistency (please don't forget that we try to keep > the daemons synced somehow - it's an ecosystem).
Yes exactly, that's why I said "it would be better to keep them all in-sync", but no point writing a diff for the 13 daemons which do the same thing (and figuring out what to do with the other not-quite-similar ones, if anything) unless we are agreed on the direction.
