On 2016-04-21, Bryan Vyhmeister <[email protected]> wrote: > Assuming MBIM is something that would be worked on, would it make sense > to extend umsm(4) to support it or would it make more sense to have a > new driver like umbim(4) or something?
It provides a network-type interface rather than a serial interface, so wouldn't be part of umsm(4). Conceptually it's closer to (but isn't compatible with) cdce or urndis.
