> Hello misc@, > > Theo wrote: > > I still don't see the use case. > > wxallowed is only meant as a temporary[1] measure until all the > applications are fixed. > > Instead, you are trying to use all the features everywhere. > > [1] Hopefully within my lifetime > > > Have mfs in the tool kit to take up the read/write shortcomings > of usb flash is a real asset. > > Also the ability to "tear down" a file system and restore it to a pristine > state is extremely valuable when dealing with usb flash.
If you are doing a copy performance like that, why do you need to run W^X violating programs from that filesystem at the same time? You haven't justified it.
