> > Anybody who had used automatic disk allocation, it would have taken > > care of this: > > > > http://man.openbsd.org/disklabel#AUTOMATIC_DISK_ALLOCATION > > > > /usr/local 10% of disk. 2G – 10G > > > exactly
Yep, I have no idea why someone wouldn't. I like having nosuid on less trusted /usr/local. It pretty much removes the need to do the security technique of find suid, like is recommended on Linux almost by "default"? I forget if it is the default mount option for /usr/local or not (breaks sudo btw)? Also, not that I care any more or many here I guess care but I remember disapproval of the reasoning behind linux discontinuing support for a seperate /usr to make booting life easier and also support corner cases like ssh capable initramfs if I remember correctly. Precisely because of my experience of OpenBSD so I certainly would never suggest that. Everything is a package with Linux I guess is a big part of permitting dropping seperate /usr "support". -- KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable
