> > Hello,
> > 
> > Using OpenBSD 5.8-stable.
> > 
> > I used to have the following in /etc/man.conf:
> > 
> > tcl85           /usr/local/lib/tcl/tcl8.5/man/
> > tcl86           /usr/local/lib/tcl/tcl8.6/man/
> > 
> > Which  made it  easy to  view  one or  the  other by  using the  section
> > argument:
> > 
> > man tcl85 Tcl
> > man tcl86 Tcl
> > 
> > man(1) still appears to be documented to have this functionality:
> > 
> >      man [-acfhklw] [-C file] [-I os=name] [-K encoding] [-M path] [-m path]
> >          [-O option=value] [-S subsection] [-s section] [-T output] [-W 
> > level]
> >          [section] name ...
> >          ^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > But I see no  way of expressing it in the new  man.conf or addressing it
> > in the  command line.  Here is what  I have added  according to  the new
> > man.conf(5):
> > 
> > manpath /usr/local/lib/tcl/tcl8.5/man
> > manpath /usr/local/lib/tcl/tcl8.6/man
> > 
> > But I don't see how to  use [section] anymore. man(1) does mention using
> > [-s section] with n  as the section, but that only  seems to display the
> > first match of tcl8.5 and does  not allow further granularity (as far as
> > I can tell).
> > 
> > Have I missed something in the man pages, or what am I doing wrong?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andy  
> 
> hi.
> 
> i don;t think it's currently possible to do exactly what you propose. i
> think ingo stripped man.conf pretty bare.
> 
> the workarounds would be:
> 
>     - have multiple conf files and use man -C to get the one you want
>     - use man -m on the command line (or aliases) to get what you want
> 
> i think man(1) is currently wrong regarding the section values in -s
> (i'll look into that).
> 
> jmc

The multiple configuration files is one working approach to multiple
work directory invocation, and these can coexist.  Then more over so,
there must be a way to call tcl85 and tcl86 something else than both
"Tcl" right?  Meaning maybe also seek ways to reconcile these in Tcl
land & potentially other multiple versions environments.  W/ regards,
please excuse me, if this is out of line or just plain inappropriate.

Reply via email to