Disclaimer: I don't want to sound too negative, I really appreciate all the
hard work that went in to OpenIKED.... but I've just made the reverse trip;
OpenIKED (IKEv2) to isakmpd (IKEv1). We just couldn't get our connections
stable with OpenIKED. We backported multiple patches from the master in to 
our 6.0 source tree which improved things but in the end after what seemed 
like about a month without trouble OpenIKED suddenly started to run in to
trouble with rekeying so I finally called it quits and deployed isakmpd.

For example we bumped in to an issue described on the mailinglist[1] with
rekeying. This is one of the patches we applied which improved things for
us but as far as I can tell this hasn't ended up in the main source tree.

Also there are some pitfalls of things that work with isakmpd but not with
iked. For example sasyncd has some shortcomings with iked [2].

We bumped into like 5 other things like this before throwing in the
towel. So my advice is: Ask yourself if you really need IKEv2 with iked 
because it won't be as smooth sailing as with isakmpd.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=147869752432059&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=147574084806723&w=2

Kind regards,

Jasper

> Op 7 februari 2017 om 18:43 schreef Christopher Sean Hilton
> <[email protected]>:
> 
> 
> How hard is it to transition from an isakmpd managed IPsec VPN to iked
> managment? I have a certificate based isakmpd solution that works. It
> is mainly just a matter of rsyncing the directories and using a little
> editor magic on the ipsec.conf file to create iked.conf?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -- Chris

  • Isakmpd vs iked Christopher Sean Hilton
    • Re: Isakmpd vs iked Jasper Siepkes

Reply via email to